Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/12/1990
Liljedahl Bros. v. Grigsby
Citations
- 215 Conn. 345
- 576 A.2d 149
- 1990 Conn. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court will not grant a motion to strike that imparts facts outside of the pleadings
- no recovery in quasi contract because plaintiff alleged oral contract; therefore, failed to comply with Act's written contract requirement
- In deciding a motion to strike the trial court cannot be aided by the assumption of any facts not alleged in the pleadings
- when the legal grounds for the motion depend on underlying facts, parties must await evidence at trial and motion to strike should be denied
- where the legal grounds for a motion to strike are dependent upon facts not alleged in the plaintiff's complaint, the defendant must await the evidence at trial and the motion should be denied
- refusal to enforce deficient home improvement agreement under theory of implied contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 283×
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 277×
- Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-07-04· cited 133×
- Zamstein v. MarvastiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-22· cited 105×
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-11· cited 95×
- Santiago v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-11-14· cited 81×
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-01· cited 78×
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-24· cited 68×
- Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-11-03· cited 48×
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-06· cited 35×
- Gural v. FazzinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-07-01· cited 25×
- Mercer v. CosleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-16· cited 19×
- Todd M. v. Richard L.Connecticut Superior Court· 1995-07-14· cited 19×
- Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-23· cited 16×
- MacMillan v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-15· cited 11×
- Metcoff v. LebovicsConnecticut Superior Court· 2007-08-16· cited 6×
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court· 2006-07-25· cited 3×
- Wilson v. BradleyConnecticut Superior Court· 2007-01-05
- Bartha v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court· 2006-10-31
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-31· cited 493×
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 169×
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-04-26· cited 156×
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-30· cited 150×
- Boland v. CatalanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-17· cited 80×
- Brighenti v. New Britain Shirt CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-12-24· cited 63×
- Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-12-27· cited 48×
- DeMello v. Town of PlainvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-04-20· cited 40×
- Sidney v. DeVriesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-06-13· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.