A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRicco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failure to comply with Home Improvement Act “is a per se violation of CUTPA by virtue of General Statutes § 20-427 (b), which provides that any violation of the Home Improvement Act is deemed to be an unfair or deceptive trade practice”
• denying recovery on CUTPA claim on ground that homeowner had not proven any loss or injury for which he could recover
• denying recovery on CUTPA claim on ground that homeowner had not proven any loss or injury for which he could recover
• contractor who failed to comply with the Act cannot recover under theory of quantum meruit
• “While CUTPA damages need not be proven with absolute precision, the failure to present any evidence concerning the nature and extent of the injury sustained precludes recovery under the statute.” (emphasis added)
• refusal to enforce nonconforming home improvement agreement under theory of quasi contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Habetz v. Condon
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 283×
• Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. Hirschfeld
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 277×
• Haesche v. Kissner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-18· cited 259×
• Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del Grosso
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-11· cited 95×
• Citaramanis v. Hallowell
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-14· cited 90×
• Meadows v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-01· cited 78×
• Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. Hirschfeld
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-24· cited 68×
• Edart Truck Rental Corp. v. B. Swirsky & Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-09-04· cited 54×
• Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-21· cited 51×
• Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Dowling
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-11-03· cited 48×
• Vezina v. Nautilus Pools, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-06-16· cited 44×
• Woronecki v. Trappe
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-22· cited 40×
• Goins v. JBC & Associates, P.C.
  D. Connecticut· 2005-01-14· cited 38×
• TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-07-22· cited 38×
• Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-06· cited 35×
• Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-08-20· cited 35×
• Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-06-23· cited 35×
• Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-09· cited 31×
• Gural v. Fazzino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-07-01· cited 25×
• Chem-Tek, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 1993-03-08· cited 23×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-21· cited 298×
• Conaway v. Prestia
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-13· cited 255×
• Barrett Builders v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 169×
• Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-08· cited 73×
• Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. House
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-20· cited 68×

Other cases named A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRicco

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRicco
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-07-04· cited 56×