Ruggiero v. Pellicci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim madequately briefed when no attempt made to apply black letter law to facts of present case
• declining to review inadequately briefed claim
• declining to review inadequately briefed claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. King
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-11· cited 16×
• State v. Erickson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-29· cited 13×
• Poirot v. Marinos
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-08-31· cited 1×
• Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Netherlands Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-08-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-19· cited 97×
• Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-10-03· cited 61×
• Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-18· cited 61×
• Jaiguay v. Vasquez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-06-17· cited 38×
• Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-06· cited 35×
• State Bank v. New Dimension Homes of Connecticut, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-07-18· cited 24×
• Moraski v. Connecticut Board of Examiners of Embalmers & Funeral Directors
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-21· cited 18×
• Johnson v. Atkinson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-24· cited 15×
• Liberty Plumbing Supply Co. v. Paul S. Yoney, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-06-04· cited 4×
• Pitts v. Decosta
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-02-22· cited 3×