Supreme Court of Connecticut· 11/3/1998
Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Dowling
Citations
- 247 Conn. 218
- 720 A.2d 235
- 1998 Conn. LEXIS 393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- underlying purpose of Home Improvement Act is to provide “public with a form of consumer protection against unscrupulous home improvement contractors”
- legislative history of General Statutes § 20-429 indicated that “technically perfect compliance with each subdivision” is not required
- strict construction of the HIA, a remedial statute, does not require perfect or ritualistic compliance with its mandates
- “[i]n construing § 20-429 [a], this court consistently has held that the requirements of that section are mandatory and that a contractor is precluded from enforcing a home improvement contract that does not satisfy its requirements”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-11· cited 204×
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-10· cited 115×
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-01· cited 78×
- Mack v. LaValleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-10-05· cited 39×
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-06· cited 35×
- State v. EhlersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-28· cited 34×
- Economos v. Liljedahl Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-08· cited 26×
- Morales v. Pentec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-04-18· cited 22×
- Brennan v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-06-13· cited 21×
- Biller Associates v. Rte. 156 Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-02-23· cited 20×
- Meribear Productions, Inc. v. FrankSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-09-22· cited 16×
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-03-02· cited 16×
- New England Custom Concrete, LLC v. CarboneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-24· cited 15×
- D' Angelo Development & Construction Co. v. CordovanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-16· cited 15×
- MJM Landscaping, Inc. v. LorantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-13· cited 14×
- Kronberg Bros. v. SteeleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-03· cited 14×
- State v. WallaceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-29· cited 13×
- ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. HobbsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-12-28· cited 12×
- MacMillan v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-15· cited 11×
- Walpole Woodworkers, Inc. v. ManningConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-01-18· cited 9×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 572×
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 283×
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-22· cited 277×
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 169×
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 154×
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-27· cited 119×
- A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 118×
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 112×
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-11· cited 95×
- Sidney v. DeVriesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 68×
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-15· cited 61×
- Doe v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 41×
- Crandall v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-28· cited 21×
- Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-06-03· cited 1×
Other cases named Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Dowling
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.