Skip to main content

Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Dowling

Citations

  • 247 Conn. 218
  • 720 A.2d 235
  • 1998 Conn. LEXIS 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • underlying purpose of Home Improvement Act is to provide “public with a form of consumer protection against unscrupulous home improvement contractors”
  • legislative history of General Statutes § 20-429 indicated that “technically perfect compliance with each subdivision” is not required
  • strict construction of the HIA, a remedial statute, does not require perfect or ritualistic compliance with its mandates
  • “[i]n construing § 20-429 [a], this court consistently has held that the requirements of that section are mandatory and that a contractor is precluded from enforcing a home improvement contract that does not satisfy its requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Dowling

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.