Skip to main content

Johnston v. State

Citations

  • 70 So. 3d 472
  • 2011 WL 1584583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conclusory allegations do not support a claim for post-conviction relief
  • explaining that there is a strong presumption that counsel’s actions were reasonable, and strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance if alternatives were considered and counsel’s decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct
  • “Mere speculation that counsel’s error affected the outcome of the proceeding is insufficient.” (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 693)
  • “Because Johnston presented only bare conclusory allegations on these several issues, he was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the claims.”
  • “Mere speculation that counsel’s error affected the outcome of the proceeding is insufficient.”
  • counsel not ineffective for failure to seek suppression of the defendant's statements because they provided an alternate reason why the defendant's fingerprints were in the victim's bathroom where the body was found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Labarga, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.