Skip to main content

McKinney v. State

Citations

  • 307 Ga. 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, because the appellant did not object to the disputed testimony at trial, the “claims are reviewed only for plain error”
  • no abuse of discretion in trial court’s conclusion that prejudice did not substantially outweigh the significant probative value of appellant’s prior assault
  • prejudicial effect of other acts evidence was mitigated by court’s limiting instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.