Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 302 Ga. 474
  • 807 S.E.2d 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “trial counsel’s performance cannot be deemed deficient for not raising an unsettled question of law”
  • stating that “[t]he limitations and prohibition on ‘other acts’ evidence set out in OCGA § 24-4-404 (b) do not apply to intrinsic evidence” (punctuation and footnote omitted)
  • rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on failure to seek a continuance to interview a witness where defendant failed to show what evidence further investigation would have uncovered
  • “The limitations and prohibition on ‘other acts’ evidence set out in [Rule 404 (b)] do not apply to intrinsic evidence.” (citations and punctuation omitted)
  • statements made by defendant in response to questioning by an emergency room nurse not subject to Miranda
  • prior act helped explain to jury, among other things, why a victim refused the defendant’s advances and the motive for the victim to end her relationship with the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.