Skip to main content

Akers v. State

Citations

  • 963 N.E.2d 615
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 95
  • 2012 WL 823641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where it was unclear from the evidence when the defendant came into possession of the paraphernalia, his conviction for possession of paraphernalia was not related in circumstances to convictions for battery and resisting law enforcement
  • noting, unlike Johnican and Cole, the defendant’s possession of paraphernalia was related neither chronologically nor in circumstance to his convictions for battery and resisting arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Kirsch, Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.