Indiana Court of Appeals· 10/7/1996
Lockhart v. State
Citations
- 671 N.E.2d 893
- 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1356
- 1996 WL 566998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a sentence which is contrary to or violative of the penalty mandated by statute is an illegal sentence
- holding that it is the general if not unanimous rule that a trial court has the power to vacate an illegal sentence and impose a proper one
- upholding Lockhart’s conviction for child molesting by fondling where he touched and rubbed child’s penis and had no non-incriminating explanations for the contact
- affirming child molesting conviction when the defendant touched the victim’s penis and rubbed it for approximately five minutes
- evidence sufficient to establish defendant’s intent to arouse or gratify his sexual desires when he rubbed victim’s penis for approximately five minutes
- “When the sentence imposed by the trial court is found to be improper, it is the general if not unanimous rule that the trial court has the power to vacate the illegal sentence and impose a proper one.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Hoffman, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weaver v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-29· cited 56×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-02-27· cited 48×
- Kirby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 37×
- Wilhelmus v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-23· cited 30×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-04· cited 24×
- Agilera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-03-07· cited 19×
- Craun v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-02-06· cited 18×
- Ellis Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-09-06· cited 17×
- Armstrong v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-01-18· cited 17×
- Kirk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-24· cited 16×
- Schumm v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-05-21· cited 14×
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-07-10· cited 11×
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-02-28· cited 11×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-09· cited 11×
- Chism v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-05-10· cited 10×
- Lane v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-17· cited 9×
- Spann v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-28· cited 8×
- Johnston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-12-09· cited 8×
- Wise v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-02-11· cited 8×
- Winters v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-27· cited 7×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-01-11· cited 405×
- Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-16· cited 204×
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-08-15· cited 179×
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-10-29· cited 97×
- Wiseheart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-04-28· cited 86×
- Bradberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-07-21· cited 77×
- Tedlock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-09-25· cited 70×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-25· cited 68×
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-12-16· cited 60×
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 52×
- Duvall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 52×
- Short v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-01-10· cited 51×
- State v. ThomlinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1960-01-09· cited 50×
- Washington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 42×
- Gray v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 41×
- Niece v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-12-14· cited 40×
- Walton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-30· cited 38×
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-03· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.