Skip to main content

Monroe v. State

Citations

  • 28 A.3d 418
  • 2011 Del. LEXIS 506
  • 2011 WL 4089879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that witness! vivid description of a shooting and the defendant evinced witness’ high degree of attention
  • “For purposes of [a sufficiency of the evidence] inquiry, this Court does not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence of a defendant’s guilt.”
  • although neither witness saw defendant commit robbery, it was enough that both placed him at the scene, and one saw him “fleeing up the street while another individual was ‘tussling’ with” victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.