Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/16/1997
Hoey v. State
Citations
- 689 A.2d 1177
- 1997 Del. LEXIS 38
- 1997 WL 40502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that evidence of a defendant’s constructive possession may be proven exclusively through circumstantial evidence
- finding sufficient evidence to find that Hoey constructively possessed cocaine where a police officer witnessed what appeared to be Hoey collecting money from drag buyers and Hoey’s companion, who was sitting near Hoey, giving the drugs to the buyers
- finding sufficient evidence to find that Hoey constructively possessed cocaine where a police officer witnessed what appeared to be Hoey collecting money from drug buyers and Hoey's companion, who was sitting near Hoey, giving the drugs to the buyers
- “A trial within a trial, based entirely on extrinsic evidence, invariably will lead to jury confusion.”
- “A trial within a trial, based entirely on extrinsic evidence, invariably will lead to jury confusion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Easlick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-05-03· cited 91×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-05-24· cited 89×
- Lecates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-10-15· cited 48×
- Cline v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-10-20· cited 47×
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2004-03-11· cited 46×
- Floudiotis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-04-06· cited 43×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-03-03· cited 29×
- Charbonneau v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-03-01· cited 27×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-09-14· cited 20×
- Lum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-09-19· cited 12×
- State v. HendersonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2005-01-11· cited 8×
- Lecates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-06-23· cited 4×
- Fortt v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-12-19· cited 2×
- State of Delaware v. Dunn.Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-09-24
- State of Delaware v. Williams.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-01-27
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-10-19
- State of Delaware v. Pardo.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-11-09
- State v. RiveraSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-08-16
- State v. MaxwellSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-08-04
- Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Union Pacific CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-11-15
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-07-31· cited 124×
- Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-05-11· cited 111×
- Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-01-25· cited 108×
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-05-16· cited 65×
- Holden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1973-02-26· cited 42×
- Matter of Estate of WatersSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-09-23· cited 24×
- McNulty v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-04-05· cited 19×
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-05-26· cited 6×
- Williams v. Warren Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-02-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.