Indiana Supreme Court· 3/29/1993

Hardin v. State

Citations

611 N.E.2d 123
1993 WL 87222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

evidence is relevant if it tends to prove or disprove a material fact or sheds any light on the guilt or innocence of the accused
evidence is relevant if it tends to prove or disprove a material fact or sheds any light on the guilt or innocence of the accused
evidence is only excluded if offered for the sole purpose of producing the “forbidden inference” that the defendant possesses certain character traits and that the defendant acted in conformity with those character traits in committing the charged offense
evidence is only excluded if offered for the sole purpose of producing the “forbidden inference” that the defendant possesses certain character traits and that the defendant acted in conformity with those character traits in committing the charged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Krahulik, Givan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hardin v. State

102 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.