Poon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a rational jury could rely on eyewitness testimony to find PFDCF beyond a reasonable doubt even though no firearm was recovered
• “[I]t is the sole province of the fact finder to determine witness credibility, resolve conflicts in testimony and draw any inferences from the proven facts.”
• “[I]t is the sole province of the fact finder to determine witness credibility, resolve conflicts in testimony and draw any inferences from the proven facts.”
• “It is the sole province of the fact finder to determine witness credibility[.]”
• “[I]t is sole province of the fact finder to determine witness credibility, resolve conflicts in testimony, and draw any inferences from the proven facts . . . . We will not substitute our judgment for the fact finder’s assessments in these areas.” (citations omitted)
• finding conflicting testimony of two eyewitnesses sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).