Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 930 A.2d 898
  • 2007 Del. LEXIS 315
  • 2007 WL 2051598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In performing our appellate review, we do not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.