Skip to main content

Young v. Kelly

Citations

  • 334 P.3d 153
  • 2014 Alas. LEXIS 171
  • 2014 WL 4160035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “we deem [retirement benefits] acquired during marriage to the extent the working spouse earns them during the marriage”
  • stating that \we deem [retirement benefits] acquired during marriage to the extent the working spouse earns them during the marriage\
  • explaining that “a salary is clearly marital property”
  • “Courts will fill in gaps where parties’ reasonable expectations are clear, but they cannot impose performance where it is not clear the parties had a meeting of the minds.”
  • “[This court] review[s] for abuse of discretion an order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.” (citing Frost v. Ayojiak, 957 P.2d 1353, 1355 (Alaska 1998))
  • \We review for abuse of discretion an order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Young v. Kelly

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.