Alaska Supreme Court· 9/24/2010

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

239 P.3d 393
2010 Alas. LEXIS 104
2010 WL 3719100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \enhanced fees may be awarded under any of the subpara-graphs of Rule 82(b)(3)\
explaining that claim might be “legally or factually so deficient as to reasonably permit an inference of vexatious or bad faith litigation conduct”
holding it was abuse of discretion not to hold contempt hearing because order at issue \was sufficiently clear that neither the issuing court nor the parties could have read it to permit [appellee] to avoid responding\
holding it was abuse of discretion not to hold contempt hearing because order at issue “was sufficiently clear that neither the issuing court nor the parties could have read it to permit [appellee] to avoid responding”
treating a \motion to clarify\ that did not address merely \clerical error\ as a motion for reconsideration
“[W]e exercise our independent judgment in determining whether there are genuine, material factual disputes that cannot be resolved without an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Christen, Stowers, Eastaugh, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.