Schickner v. Schickner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the majority of jurisdictions decline to adopt bright-line rules when valuing minority interests in a domestic relations case
• holding a 3 MUSCARELLA v. MUSCARELLA Decision of the Court husband’s distributions from the community business were “attributable to the community as profits derived from existing community assets”
• noting that “the community is generally entitled to the profits and gains attributable to community assets” (cleaned up); “[T]he service of a petition for dissolution does not alter the status of preexisting community property.” (citation omitted)
• noting profits derived from existing community assets are subject to equitable division
• a factual finding is erroneous if no substantial evidence supports it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).