Skip to main content

Carr v. Carr

Citations

  • 152 P.3d 450
  • 2007 Alas. LEXIS 10
  • 2007 WL 431338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying abuse of discretion standard to trial court's denial of husband's request for fees in divorce action
  • \Judge Smith's written decision.denying Kelly's recusal motion thoroughly explained the judge's basis for refusing to remove himself from the case and persuasively refuted Kelly's accounting of actual and apparent bias.\
  • \[I]t is not our role as an appellate court to reweigh the evidence....\
  • \We review a trial court's decision to classify property as marital only for abuse of discretion; and we review the court's underlying factual findings only for clear error.\ (citations omitted)
  • \The superior court may impute the rental value of one party's exclusive use of the marital residence after separation to that party when it equitably divides the marital estate between the parties.\ (citation omitted)
  • \We review a trial court's decisions regarding a party's telephonic appearance for abuse of discretion.\ (citing Richard B. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Div. of Family & Youth Servs., 71 P.3d 811, 817 (Alaska 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.