Skip to main content

Hall v. State

Citations

  • 705 A.2d 50
  • 119 Md. App. 377
  • 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[w]eighing the credibility of witnesses and resolving any conflicts in the evidence are tasks proper for the fact-finder”
  • holding testimony regarding course of investigation irrelevant where “none of the testimony concerning the police investigations . . . had any direct bearing on the guilt or innocence of appellant”
  • stating “[c]ir-cumstantial evidence is entirely sufficient to support a conviction, provided the circumstances support rational inferences from which the trier of fact could be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused”
  • quot-ing Folk v. State, 11 Md.App. 508, 518, 275 A.2d 184 (1971)
  • “[I]f the improper line of questioning is interrupted by other testimony or evidence and is thereafter resumed, counsel must state for the record that he or she renews the continuing objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Byrnes, Bloom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.