Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1/29/1998
Hall v. State
Citations
- 705 A.2d 50
- 119 Md. App. 377
- 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[w]eighing the credibility of witnesses and resolving any conflicts in the evidence are tasks proper for the fact-finder”
- holding testimony regarding course of investigation irrelevant where “none of the testimony concerning the police investigations . . . had any direct bearing on the guilt or innocence of appellant”
- stating “[c]ir-cumstantial evidence is entirely sufficient to support a conviction, provided the circumstances support rational inferences from which the trier of fact could be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused”
- quot-ing Folk v. State, 11 Md.App. 508, 518, 275 A.2d 184 (1971)
- “[I]f the improper line of questioning is interrupted by other testimony or evidence and is thereafter resumed, counsel must state for the record that he or she renews the continuing objection”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Byrnes, Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 144×
- Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-25· cited 80×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-28· cited 63×
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-05· cited 58×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-26· cited 38×
- Kang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-02· cited 30×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-02· cited 29×
- Neal v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 27×
- Painter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-05-05· cited 26×
- Gregg Neck Yacht Club, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-03· cited 24×
- Facon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 21×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-02· cited 18×
- Stuckey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-05· cited 18×
- Larocca v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-29· cited 17×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-31· cited 17×
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-23· cited 15×
- Butkiewicz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-08· cited 15×
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-09· cited 13×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-27· cited 11×
- Sydnor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-30· cited 10×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-10· cited 120×
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-08· cited 102×
- Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-29· cited 96×
- Binnie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-10· cited 77×
- Folk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-31· cited 73×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 70×
- Finke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-08· cited 55×
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
- Muir v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-12-02· cited 43×
- Muir v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-08· cited 36×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-08-30· cited 28×
- Zemo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-02· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.