Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/5/2004
Painter v. State
Citations
- 848 A.2d 692
- 157 Md. App. 1
- 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that circumstantial evidence was legally sufficient to support a theft conviction
- “[t]he test is ‘not whether the evidence should have or probably would have persuaded the majority of fact finders but only whether it possibly could have persuaded any rational fact finder’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Krauser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-02· cited 18×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-31· cited 17×
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-29· cited 12×
- State v. PairCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-07· cited 11×
- LDT Keller Farms, LLC v. Brigitte Holmes Livestock Co.N.D. Indiana· 2010-06-25· cited 10×
- Molina v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-12-23· cited 10×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-30· cited 8×
- Benton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-31· cited 6×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-30· cited 5×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-07· cited 5×
- In Re Lavar D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 4×
- Chow v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-02· cited 4×
- Angulo-Gil v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-31· cited 4×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-30· cited 4×
- Dyson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-07-13· cited 4×
- Nathan Carl Gilbert v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-02-22· cited 3×
- In re: David P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-09-27· cited 1×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-14· cited 1×
- Michael J. Davis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-07-13
- Aleman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-09-25
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 731×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 144×
- Moody v. CorsentinoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-01-11· cited 140×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, SuperintendentThird Circuit· 1975-08-05· cited 124×
- United States v. Michael Roberts, United States of America v. Charles Williams, United States of America v. Stanley YelardySixth Circuit· 1977-02-02· cited 123×
- United States v. Leo Orlando MunizTenth Circuit· 1993-07-22· cited 116×
- United States v. Gerald D. CastorSeventh Circuit· 1991-06-04· cited 111×
- Moye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-16· cited 88×
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-19· cited 77×
- United States v. Raymond Leon CurrierFirst Circuit· 1987-12-10· cited 75×
- Joseph F. Tinghitella v. State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1983-10-12· cited 67×
- Butz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-12-10· cited 56×
- United States v. Joseph Charles Milhollan, A/K/A Alec Leroy FoltzThird Circuit· 1979-03-12· cited 55×
- Fraidin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-11· cited 52×
- United States v. Norman Gaylord ReedNinth Circuit· 1980-06-27· cited 50×
- State v. BarefieldWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-16· cited 47×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-29· cited 46×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-26· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.