Finke v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that police lies to defendant, including that his fingerprints were recovered at crime scene, did not render defendant’s statements involuntary
• “[I]f [the witness] was shown not to accurately remember the facts to which he testified, then, in effect, he was ‘making it up’ or ‘fabricating it.’”
• testimony that was inadmissible in the first trial because of procedural failure rather than substantively inadmissible was admissible in retrial when the trial court corrected procedural error
• defendant and the third party were first cousins

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).