Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/29/2005
Larocca v. State
Citations
- 883 A.2d 986
- 164 Md. App. 460
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is common knowledge that people use marijuana by sharing a single cigarette and inhaling the smoke from the cigarette and the ambient smoke”
- defendant was one of two passengers and marijuana was found under the front seat
- “[T]he evidence permitted an inference that the appellant was engaged in the mutual use and enjoyment of marijuana (the fourth Folk factor) and that the three occupants of the car were engaged in a marijuana-focused common enterprise.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sissoko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-04-09· cited 680×
- Neal v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 27×
- State v. OforiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-08· cited 23×
- Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-04· cited 23×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-31· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-04-05· cited 15×
- In re: O.P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-29· cited 11×
- Belote v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-24· cited 9×
- Price v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-25· cited 6×
- Cerrato-Molina v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-06-01· cited 6×
- Samba v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-28· cited 5×
- Fone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-06-06· cited 2×
- Sissoko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-01-31
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,610×
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 987×
- Powers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-06-15· cited 221×
- State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-21· cited 213×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 144×
- Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-14· cited 129×
- Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-10· cited 120×
- United States v. Bernard L. FergFifth Circuit· 1974-12-09· cited 105×
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-18· cited 101×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-09-12· cited 99×
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-20· cited 96×
- Moye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-16· cited 88×
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-04· cited 88×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 87×
- United States v. Tiffany Sherrell Stanley, Charles Reynaldo CameronEleventh Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 75×
- Folk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-31· cited 73×
- State v. SuddithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-12· cited 72×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.