Southern Management Corp. v. Taha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the jury's exoneration of the employees named as defendants would not invalidate verdict against employer if there was evidence that an employee who was not named as a defendant committed the tort alleged by the plaintiff
• explaining that the jury’s exoneration of the employ ees named as defendants would not invalidate verdict against employer if there was evidence that an employee who was not named as a defendant committed the tort alleged by the plaintiff
• discussing The N. Cent. Ry. Co. v. Maryland, ex rel. Adeline Price, 29 Md. 420 (1868)
• explaining that the jury’s exonera- tion of the employees named as defendants would not invalidate ver- dict against employer if there was evidence that an employee who was not named as a defendant committed the tort alleged by the plain- tiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).