Skip to main content

Handy v. State

Citations

  • 930 A.2d 1111
  • 175 Md. App. 538
  • 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[cjircumstantial evidence alone is sufficient to support a conviction, provided the circumstances support rational inferences from which the trier of fact could be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused.” (citations and internal quotations omitted)
  • applying factors in Folk v. State, 11 Md.App. 508, 518, 275 A.2d 184 (1971), “1
  • “ ‘doubt or ambiguity as to whether the legislature intended that there be multiple punishments for the same act or transaction “ ‘will be resolved against turning a single transaction into multiple offenses’ ” ’ ”
  • discussing constructive possession of contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.