Supreme Court of Florida· 4/28/2005

Green v. State

Citations

907 So. 2d 489
2005 WL 977018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to instruct the jury that the defendant would receive credit for time served and that “there is no guarantee that the defendant would be granted parole at or after 25 years”
finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to instruct the jury that the defendant would receive credit for time served and that \there is no guarantee that the defendant would be granted parole at or after 25 years\
“A trial court does have discretion in answering or refusing to answer a jury’s question.”
“A trial court [has] discretion in answering or refusing to answer a jury’s question.”
a question clarifying a defendant’s eligibility for parole was a question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.