Supreme Court of Florida· 9/22/2011

Armstrong v. State

Citations

73 So. 3d 155
36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517
2011 Fla. LEXIS 2255
2011 WL 4389009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that once the moving party has demonstrated a probability of tampering, “the burden shifts to the nonmoving 5 party to establish a proper chain of custody or submit other evidence that tampering did not occur”
clarifying that a photograph maintains relevance where it is probative of facts beyond what was stipulated to
finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to instruct the jury that the defendant would be credited with time served, even though the trial court did not also instruct the jury that the defendant “was not guaranteed parole at or after 25 years”
finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to instruct the jury that the defendant would be credited with time served, even though the trial court did not also instruct the jury that the defendant \was not guaranteed parole at or after 25 years\
Pariente, J., concurring in 20. Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017); see Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016). - 90 - part and dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Quince, Polston, Perry, Canady, Pariente, Labarga

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.