Skip to main content

Gray v. State

Citations

  • 233 S.W.3d 295
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 657
  • 2007 WL 1489762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s erroneous exclusion of potential juror for economic reasons did not merit reversal because defendant did not show he did not “received a trial by an impartial jury comprised of qualified individuals”
  • concluding that appellant’s only substantial right is that jurors who serve be qualified
  • holding that trial court’s erroneous exclusion of potential juror for economic reasons did not merit reversal because defendant did not show he did not “received a trial by an impartial jury comprised of qualified individuals”
  • “Just as the Supreme Court explained in Taylor v. Louisiana, [419 U.S. 522, 538 (1975

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.