Matthew Hamann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that statutory violations are to be treated as non-constitutional errors in conducting a harm analysis
• noting that although identity of fingerprint expert was surprise to defendant, degree of disadvantage “was minimal because [defendant] was aware that the State would call a fingerprint expert”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).