Skip to main content

Aguirre-Mata v. State

Citations

  • 992 S.W.2d 495
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 55
  • 1999 WL 330240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand the cause to that court to conduct a harm analysis pursuant to Rule 44.2(b).”
  • defendant did not claim violation of Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment but claimed only a violation of Article 26.13(a)(1)
  • admonishments embodied in Article 26.13(a), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, are not constitutionally required
  • admonishments embodied in Article 3 26.13(a), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, are not constitutionally required
  • Failure to admonish defendant of the deportation consequences of his guilty plea and failure to admonish on the range of punishment is statutory error subject to 44.2(b) harm analysis.
  • cit- ing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.13(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.