Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 195 S.W.3d 311
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4400
  • 2006 WL 1389584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial court abused its discretion in ordering the defendant to be shackled because there was no showing of exceptional circumstances or a manifest need to shackle the defendant
  • concluding trial court abused its discretion in ordering the defendant to be shackled because there was no showing of exceptional circumstances or a manifest need to shackle the defendant
  • stating circumstantial evidence alone may be sufficient to prove party status
  • “The record does show some interference with attorney-client communication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie Brock Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.