Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 5/18/2006
Davis v. State
Citations
- 195 S.W.3d 311
- 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4400
- 2006 WL 1389584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding trial court abused its discretion in ordering the defendant to be shackled because there was no showing of exceptional circumstances or a manifest need to shackle the defendant
- concluding trial court abused its discretion in ordering the defendant to be shackled because there was no showing of exceptional circumstances or a manifest need to shackle the defendant
- stating circumstantial evidence alone may be sufficient to prove party status
- “The record does show some interference with attorney-client communication.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leslie Brock Yates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Jonathon C.B.Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 174×
- Royerick Washington v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-11-19· cited 72×
- Wiseman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-03-21· cited 28×
- In Re Jonathon CBIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-11-28· cited 25×
- Triston Young v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-01-23· cited 14×
- Abraham Jacob Proenza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-23· cited 12×
- Yglesias v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-04-24· cited 11×
- In re I.A.G.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-01· cited 11×
- Boone v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-07-31· cited 10×
- Limon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2010-06-17· cited 7×
- Mason v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-07-06· cited 4×
- In Re IagTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-10-01
- Treola Hawkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-01-07
- Ex Parte: Stephen E. Meiwes, RelatorTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-09-05
- Ronnie Duane Mason v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-06-04
- Andrew Christian Young v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-07-25
- in the Matter of I.A.G.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-10-01
- Charles Anthony Young v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-12-21
- Ralph Boone v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-07-31
- Leslie Bradford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-06-19
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-31· cited 5,788×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 2,816×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 1,170×
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,034×
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 804×
- Cardenas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-04-26· cited 758×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-15· cited 716×
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18· cited 566×
- Potier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-02-13· cited 554×
- Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-16· cited 501×
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 478×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-05-25· cited 374×
- Ransom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-24· cited 360×
- Canales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-01-15· cited 306×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.