Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 2/19/2010

Gorzynski v. Jetblue Airways Corp.

Citations

  • 596 F.3d 93
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3424
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,818
  • 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 769
  • 2010 WL 569367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that adverse employment action that follows shortly after protected activity under the ADEA can establish a causal connection
  • recognizing that Gross “eliminat[ed] the mixed-motive analysis that circuit courts had brought into the ADEA from Title VII cases.”’
  • holding that “the fact that other younger employees were not disciplined for violating numerous policies is . . . prima facie evidence of discrimination”
  • holding that the Supreme Court's decision in Gross did not disturb \the [ McDonnell Douglas ] burden-shifting framework for ADEA cases that has been consistently employed in [the Second] Circuit\
  • holding that six sexual comments and multiple instances of non- consensual touching and staring, occurring over seven months, constituted sufficient evidence for hostile work environment claim
  • holding that non-African American plaintiff had established a prima facie claim of Title VII retaliation stemming from “concerns she expressed on behalf of an African–American coworker”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Calabresi, Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

232 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gorzynski v. Jetblue Airways Corp.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.