Saenger v. Montefiore Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider, as evidence, plaintiff’s perception that his employer engaged in a pattern of discrimination against older employees because it was speculation
• considering whether plaintiff’s 50-year-old colleague was similarly situated and differentially treated for purposes of analyzing his ADEA claim
• “[W]hether the complaints against Plaintiff were truthful, and whether, if true, they justify termination, are immaterial disputes.”
• “[W]hether the complaints against Plaintiff were truthful, and whether, if true, they justify termination, are immaterial disputes.”
• “vague claims of differential treatment alone do not suggest discrimination, unless those treated differently are ‘similarly situated in all material respects’”
• “A plaintiff fails to allege a sufficient causal connection between protected activity and adverse employment action when the protected activity is preceded by significant misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).