Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/15/2010

McGULLAM v. CEDAR GRAPHICS, INC.

Citations

  • 609 F.3d 70
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12159
  • 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 782
  • 2010 WL 2366026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the same harassing acts by the same harasser are more likely to be part of the same actionable hostile environment claim
  • explaining that transfer to a “different sector of the building” is one reason prior events were unrelated
  • “continuing violation” doctrine did not apply where timely claims concerned an inappropriate comment about a sleepover and untimely claims concerned “lewd” comments made by individuals in a different department and “sector of the building”
  • “Title VII’s administrative exhaustion provision requires that any complaint be filed with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discriminatory act.”
  • the court could consider comments that were not directed to or about the plaintiff “but also contributed to a work environment that was hostile to women.”
  • “[A] state law depriving its courts of jurisdiction over a state law claim also operates to divest a federal court of jurisdiction to decide the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Kearse, Calabresi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.