Sousa v. Marquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff who has such knowledge of the facts giving rise to his access claim “does have adequate access to a judicial remedy”
• noting that the “viability of backward-looking right-of-access claims is far from clear in this Circuit” and declining to decide the issue
• noting that the “viability of backward-looking right-of-access claims is far from clear in this Circuit” and declining to decide the issue
• noting that the “viability of backward-looking right-of-access claims is far from clear in this Circuit” and declining to decide the issue
• backward-looking claim could be available “only if a judicial remedy was completely foreclosed by the false statement or nondisclosure.”
• affirming denial of summary judgment for right-to-court-access claim because the plaintiff “has not shown a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to an alleged injury resulting from [allegedly erroneous official] reports”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).