· 8/24/2010
Jones v. Oklahoma City Public Schools
Citations
- 617 F.3d 1273
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17676
- 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 4
- 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,967
- 2010 WL 3310226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the McDonnell Douglas framework continues to apply to ADEA claims
- holding that the McDonnell Douglas framework applies to ADEA claims
- “[W]e conclude that [Gross] does not preclude our continued application of McDonnell Douglas to ADEA claims.”
- “To prove a prima facie case of age discrimination, a plaintiff must show: 1
- “This circuit has long held that plaintiffs may use the McDonnell Douglas [Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)] three-step analysis to prove age discrimination under the ADEA.”
- applying McDonnell Douglas to age discrimination claim under the ADEA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Seymour, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.