Skip to main content
· 8/24/2010

Jones v. Oklahoma City Public Schools

Citations

  • 617 F.3d 1273
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17676
  • 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 4
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,967
  • 2010 WL 3310226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the McDonnell Douglas framework continues to apply to ADEA claims
  • holding that the McDonnell Douglas framework applies to ADEA claims
  • “[W]e conclude that [Gross] does not preclude our continued application of McDonnell Douglas to ADEA claims.”
  • “To prove a prima facie case of age discrimination, a plaintiff must show: 1
  • “This circuit has long held that plaintiffs may use the McDonnell Douglas [Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)] three-step analysis to prove age discrimination under the ADEA.”
  • applying McDonnell Douglas to age discrimination claim under the ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Seymour, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.