Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 4/1/2008

Holcomb v. Iona College

Citations

  • 521 F.3d 130
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6897
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,140
  • 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1844
  • 2008 WL 852129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s burden of production was “satisfied by the testimony of [decisionmakers] that they reached the decision [to terminate plaintiff] on race-neutral grounds”
  • concluding that “where an employee is subjected to adverse action because an employer disapproves of interracial association, the employee suffers discrimination because of the employee’s own race”
  • holding that a fact finder could infer that “Brennan, Petriccione, or both, played a meaningful role in the decision to terminate Holcomb.”
  • holding that the court must view all facts “in the light most fa- vorable” to the non-moving party
  • holding that the court must view all facts “in the light most favorable” to the non-moving party
  • holding that “where an employee is subjected to adverse action because an employer disapproves of interracial association, the employee suffers discrimination because of the employee’s own race” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Calabresi, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

376 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Holcomb v. Iona College

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.