District of Columbia· 8/30/2011
Perry v. Clinton
Citations
- 831 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2011 WL 6409116
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting Plaintiff’s contention that purported use of the wrong standard was probative of animus in the absence of any evidence of intentional wrongdoing
- prohibiting plaintiff from “adding clearly unexhausted retaliation claims to her complaint in this Court”
- “An RFC is not a medical determination but an administrative 17 finding or legal decision reserved to the Commissioner based on consideration of all the relevant 18 evidence, including medical evidence, lay witnesses and subjective symptoms.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-16· cited 127×
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-20· cited 64×
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-02· cited 54×
- Mosleh v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-28
- Yaich v. ScaliaDistrict of Columbia· 2022-08-05
- Risch v. CardonaDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-18
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 1,801×
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
- Jones v. BernankeD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 725×
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 558×
- Woodruff, Phillip v. Peters, MaryD.C. Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 393×
- Adeyemi v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2008-05-16· cited 298×
- Payne v. SalazarD.C. Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 220×
- Jackson v. GonzalesD.C. Circuit· 2007-08-10· cited 189×
- Buggs v. PowellDistrict of Columbia· 2003-11-19· cited 185×
- Montgomery v. ChaoD.C. Circuit· 2008-11-14· cited 182×
- Mayers v. Laborers' Health & Safety Fund of North AmericaD.C. Circuit· 2007-03-02· cited 118×
- Royall v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIOD.C. Circuit· 2008-11-21· cited 113×
- Anderson, Vicente J. v. Zubieta, AlbertoD.C. Circuit· 1999-07-02· cited 103×
- Schuler v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPD.C. Circuit· 2010-02-16· cited 101×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.