Ninth Circuit· 8/17/1995
Girard v. Rubin
Citations
- 62 F.3d 1244
- 1995 WL 489140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because timeliness had “already been resolved against [the agency] 7 by a binding decision of the EEOC, the [agency] may not now raise the argument that it did not 8 waive the timeliness argument”
- distinguishing Boyd and holding an agency waived a timeliness 5 challenge where the EEOC decided a complaint was timely
- finding waiver where the EEOC ruled the complaint was timely
- agency expressly rejected 10 complaint for untimeliness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canby, Fernandez, Sneed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyFourth Circuit· 2006-02-16· cited 1,410×
- David W. Ellis, Jr. v. Gordon R. EnglandEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-16· cited 592×
- Herbert K. Wilson v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary, Department of TransportationD.C. Circuit· 1996-03-22· cited 133×
- Nicanor A. BRIONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Jr., Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1996-12-02· cited 104×
- Cristobal D. Ramirez v. Secretary, U.S. Department of TransportationEleventh Circuit· 2012-07-12· cited 93×
- Scott, Alfrieda S. v. Johanns, MichaelD.C. Circuit· 2005-06-03· cited 61×
- Delcio Rivera-Rosario v. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Mike Espy, SecretaryFirst Circuit· 1998-08-11· cited 28×
- William D. Morris v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseThird Circuit· 2005-08-22· cited 26×
- Carver v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-05-27· cited 22×
- Burkes v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-15· cited 21×
- Raymond Nicklin v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceSixth Circuit· 2003-12-19· cited 20×
- Massingill v. NicholsonFifth Circuit· 2007-08-09· cited 18×
- Herron v. VenemanDistrict of Columbia· 2004-02-09· cited 14×
- Howell v. Department of the ArmyM.D. Alabama· 1997-01-30· cited 12×
- Adams v. HendersonD. Maryland· 2000-11-01· cited 9×
- Higdon v. MabusS.D. California· 2014-03-11· cited 5×
- Lanham v. ShinsekiD. Connecticut· 2009-09-04· cited 4×
- Williams v. HermanE.D. California· 2001-01-11· cited 4×
- DesRoches v. USPSD. New Hampshire· 2006-06-12· cited 2×
- Pinegar v. ShinsekiM.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-10-14· cited 1×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanNinth Circuit· 1994-05-18· cited 762×
- Boyd v. United States Postal ServiceNinth Circuit· 1985-01-22· cited 206×
- Stevens v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court· 1991-04-24· cited 145×
- Jasper C. Rowe v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesFifth Circuit· 1992-09-11· cited 125×
- Lawrence Ellis MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald DEVINE, Director of the Office of Personnel Management, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesEleventh Circuit· 1986-01-30· cited 65×
- Jay Johnson v. United States Treasury Department William Von Robb, Commissioner United States CustomsNinth Circuit· 1994-06-20· cited 50×
- Kenneth L. Shea v. Peter Tisch, Etc.First Circuit· 1989-03-24· cited 48×
- Janie L. Haskins v. United States Department of the ArmySixth Circuit· 1987-01-08· cited 43×
- Norwich Eaton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BowenSupreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 32×
- Houseton v. NimmoNinth Circuit· 1982-03-01· cited 30×
- James B. MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald B. RICE, Secretary of Air Force, Defendant-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1993-01-29· cited 29×
- Smith v. KaldorSixth Circuit· 1989-03-17· cited 22×
- Warren A. Proud v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1989-04-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.