Lawrence Ellis MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald DEVINE, Director of the Office of Personnel Management, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that EEOC determinations for federal employees are different and may be binding on the courts
• “[A]n employee who seeks redress of an agency’s refusal to comply with [the OFO’s decision] .... may request enforcement by the district court without requesting and trying the merits of the claim.”
• \[A]n employee who seeks redress of an agency's refusal to comply with [the OFO's decision] . . . . may request enforcement by the district court without requesting and trying the merits of the claim.\
• \[A]n employee who seeks redress of an agency’s refusal to comply with [the OFO’s decision] . . . . may request enforcement by the district court without requesting and try- ing the merits of the claim.\
• “[W]here ... the employee files a complaint asking the district court to consider the case on the merits and proceeds to trial de novo of the very claims resolved by the [OFO], he or she cannot complain when the district court independently resolves the claim on the merits.”
• discussing differences in administrative remedies for private-sector and federal employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).