Skip to main content
· 8/22/2005

William D. Morris v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense

Citations

  • 420 F.3d 287
  • 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1852
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17987
  • 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12
  • 2005 WL 2000955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining \trial de novo\ as involving judicial review \without deferring to any prior administrative adjudication\ and \entirely independent of the administrative proceedings\
  • defining \trial de novo\ as \without deferring to any prior administrative adjudication\ and \entirely independent of the administrative proceedings\
  • “We hold that, when a federal employee comes to court to challenge, in whole or in part, the administrative disposition of his or her discrimination claims, the court must consider those claims de novo, and is not bound by the results of the administrative process.... ”
  • “We hold that, when a federal employee comes to court to challenge, in whole or in part, the administrative disposition of his or her discrimination claims, the court must consider those claims de novo, and is not bound by the results of the administrative process . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Fisher, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.