Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 11/1/2000

Adams v. Henderson

Citations

  • 197 F.R.D. 162
  • 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 3
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16056
  • 2000 WL 1643980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 23(b)(2) “is not intended to reach cases where the Plaintiffs primarily seek damages.”
  • denying class certification due to, among other things, the fact that individualized damages inquiries would inevitably by required for the compensatory and punitive damages claims
  • relying on Allison to deny 23(b)(3) certification of Title VII class
  • “[B]ecause the plaintiffs not only failed to submit an affidavit, but also failed even to allude to [Rule 56] in their opposition, their request for additional discovery is denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smalkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.