Skip to main content
· 3/24/1989

Kenneth L. Shea v. Peter Tisch, Etc.

Citations

  • 870 F.2d 786
  • 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1461
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3738
  • 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,857
  • 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 625
  • 1989 WL 25512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the court “must take it as established that to provide plaintiff with the accommodation plaintiff seeks . . . . would violate the collective bargaining agreement” and was therefore not a reasonable request
  • person with \anxiety disorder\ was handicapped for purposes of federal discrimination law
  • “Consequently, we ... conclude that the postal service was not required to accommodate plaintiff further by placing him in a different position since to do so would violate the rights of other employees under the collective bargaining agreement.”
  • same, under analogous provisions of Rehabilitation Act
  • same, under analogous provisions of Rehabilitation Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Breyer, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.