Skip to main content
· 7/24/2008

Gilmore v. Citigroup, Inc.

Citations

  • 535 F.3d 45
  • 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1449
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15645
  • 2008 WL 2840601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he ... election by appellants to participate in the CAP served as a formal modification of th[e] terms [of the commission grids].”
  • “Although the Supreme Courts of Florida and Georgia have not addressed the precise questions before us today, the state law on these issues is clear and well-established.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Howard, Gelpí

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.