JM Montgomery Roofing Co., Inc. v. Fred Howland, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that multiple instruments entered into on different days but concerning the same subject matter may, depending upon the circumstances, be regarded as one contract
• loan guarantee was subject to terms of loan agreement, yet was executed several days before the loan agreement was executed
• “[W]here an agreement is evidenced by two or more writings, the writing must be construed together.”; Huntington on the Green Condo. v. Lemon Tree I-Condo., 874 So. 2d 1, 4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004
• “The rule inhibits the use of parol evidence to contradict, vary, defeat, or modify a complete and 18 unambiguous written instrument, or to change, add to, or subtract from it, or affect its construction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).