· 11/24/1992
United States v. Frances Slade
Citations
- 980 F.2d 27
- 23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20494
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30888
- 1992 WL 340665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that “a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court”
- holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived
- emphasizing that \a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court\
- emphasizing that \a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court\
- emphasizing that \a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court\
- holding _____ that \a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Coffin, Boudin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.