Skip to main content

Weems v. Citigroup Inc.

Citations

  • 453 Mass. 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that stock options awarded under a voluntary payroll program, which included a forfeiture provision upon termination, did not constitute \wages\ subject to the Massachusetts Weekly Wage Act
  • holding that the “operative fact” in finding discretionary bonuses not to be definitely determined is “not [that] they are labeled bonuses, but [that] the employers are, apparently, under no obligation to award them”
  • indicating that the “operative fact” in determining that bonuses are not “wages” under the Wage Act is their discretionaiy nature, “because the employers are. . . . under no obligation to award them”
  • holding that bonuses are not wages
  • distinguishing the narrow purpose of the Wage Act from broader remedial statutes like the state Equal Pay Act, where the term “wages” has been interpreted as encompassing all potential sources of pay
  • discretionary stock option plan not wages because contingent on continued employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ireland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.