Skip to main content
· 3/30/2007

Curran v. Cousins

Citations

  • 482 F. Supp. 2d 36
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25930
  • 2007 WL 1040693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The employer need not tolerate speech that evinces or encourages ‘intransigence and insubordination.’” (quoting Hennessy v. City of Melrose, 194 F.3d 237, 248 (1st Cir. 1999)), aff’d, 509 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.