Peoples Nat. Bank v. First Union Nat. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the plaintiff “could not and did not allege that it had directly conferred a benefit on the defendants,” and dismissal with prejudice was proper
• upholding trial court’s dismissal of unjust enrichment claim against third parties when plaintiff made payments to a bank and bank distributed payments to third parties
• “plaintiff ... did not allege that it had directly conferred a benefit on the defendants ...”
• “[T]he plaintiff … could not and did not allege that it had directly conferred a benefit on the defendants.”
• conferral of direct benefit required
• conferral of direct benefit required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).