Squindo v. Osuna-Squindo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing permanent alimony award that consumed approximately 70% of husband’s net monthly income and left former husband with $600 per month
• reversing permanent alimony award which consumed approximately seventy percent (70%) of husband's net monthly income and left former husband with $600 per month
• \[T]he ability to request financial assistance from [the husband's] . . . family is an irrelevant justification for this alimony award.\
• reversing payment equaling 70% of net income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).