Rabbath v. Farid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[a]dultery can be considered in fashioning an unequal distribution of assets and liabilities to the extent the marital misconduct depleted marital resources\
• recognizing that \[a]dultery can be considered in fashioning an unequal distribution of assets and liabilities to the extent the marital misconduct depleted marital SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 20 (0) 1947A 04 resources\
• recognizing that \[a]dultery can be considered in fashioning an unequal distribution of assets and liabilities to the extent the marital misconduct depleted marital SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 20 (0) 1947A 04 resources\
• recognizing that \[a]dultery can be considered in fashioning an unequal distribution of assets and liabilities to the extent the marital misconduct depleted marital SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 20 (0) 1947A 04 resources\
• reversing imputation of income based on past, foreign job because “[n]o evidence was presented regarding the current, prevailing earnings level and the potential source(s) or amount of 2 income in the pertinent community.” (emphasis added)
• finding error in imputing income to the appellant where “[n]o evidence was presented regarding the current, 4 prevailing earnings level and the potential source(s) or amount of income in the pertinent community”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).